UBB.Dev
Posted By: AllenAyres Google, Barney - 03/24/2004 6:48 PM
(from NY Times)

In Searching We Trust
By DAVID HOCHMAN

Published: March 14, 2004


BEN SILVERMAN is what you might call a Google obsessive. A producer and a former talent agent best known for bringing "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" to American television, Mr. Silverman Googles people he is lunching with. He Googles for breaking news, restaurant reviews and obscure song lyrics. He Googles prospective reality-show contestants to make sure they don't have naked pictures floating around the Web. And, like every self-respecting Hollywood player, he Googles himself. Competitively.

"Guys all over town are on the phone saying, `I bet I can get more Google hits than you.' " he said recently. "It's become this ridiculous new power game."

It's more like the new kabbalah. With an estimated 200 million searches logged daily, Google, the most popular Internet search engine, "has a near-religious quality in the minds of many users," said Joseph Janes, an associate professor at the University of Washington in Seattle who taught a graduate seminar on Google this semester. "A few years ago, you would have talked to a trusted friend about arthritis or where to send your kids to college or where to go on vacation. Now we turn to Google."

The Web site that has become a verb is many things to many people, and to some, perhaps too much: a dictionary, a detective service, a matchmaker, a recipe generator, an ego massager, a spiffy new add-on for the brain. Behind the rainbow logo, Google is changing culture and consciousness. Or maybe not — maybe it's the world's biggest time-waster, a vacuous rabbit hole where, in January, 60 million Americans, according to Nielsen/Net Ratings, foraged for long-lost prom dates and the theme from "Doogie Howser, M.D."

"In one sense, with Google, everything is knowable now," said Esther Dyson, who publishes Release 1.0, a technology-industry newsletter. "We were much more passive about information in the past. We would go to the library or the phone book, and if it wasn't there, we didn't worry about it. Now, people can't as easily drift from your life. We can't pretend to be ignorant." But the flood of unedited information, she said, demands that users sharpen critical thinking skills, to filter the results. "Google," she said, "forces us to ask, `What do we really want to know?' "

Google delivers information that can radically alter one's self-perception. About a quarter of "vanity" searchers — those who search for their own names — say they are surprised by how much information they find about themselves, according to a survey by the Pew Internet Project.

Sometimes, they're really surprised. When Orey Steinmann, 17, of Los Angeles, entered his unusual name on Google's query line, he discovered that he was listed on a Canadian Web site for missing children and told a teacher. After an investigation, county officials took him into protective custody last month and federal marshals arrested his mother, Gisele Marie Goudreault. She has been charged in Canada with parental abduction, said Barbara Masterson, an assistant United States attorney in Los Angeles. Canadian authorities are seeking Ms. Goudreault's extradition, and Orey is deciding whether to contact the father he never knew.

Then there are the Google miracle stories. The morning after five left-handed electric guitars owned by Robert McLaughlin were stolen from a storage room at his San Diego apartment complex last year, he searched Google's image library for guitar photos to use on a reward poster. Instead, he found the stolen goods. "The thief was selling them in a live auction," he said. "In the past, my report would have gotten lost in a mountain of paperwork. Because of Google, the cops recovered four of the five guitars that week."

While some compare Google's reservoir of six billion documents to the ancient library at Alexandria, it often feels like the shallowest ocean on earth. "Google can be useful as a starting point to research or for superficial inquests," said James H. Billington, the Librarian of Congress. "But far too often, it is a gateway to illiterate chatter, propaganda and blasts of unintelligible material."

The trouble is, despite those queries that return 753,000 Internet links in 0.34 second, Google is by no means a fount of human knowledge. It is short on history, since most Web pages have been created since 1995, and it is overloaded with sex, sports, conspiracy theories and pop stars. Its algorithm for indexing search results is based on popularity, not necessarily accuracy. The more links a Web page has, the higher its rank on Google. Type "apple" and expect to wade through dozens of results out of more than 28 million before arriving at a Web site even closely related to the fruit.

"That you found it on Google doesn't make it right," said Leon Botstein, the president of Bard College and music director of the American Symphony Orchestra. He is concerned that Google is a ticket to procrastination, a vehicle for intellectual fakery, a forum for crackpots and conspiracy theorists. He said "Google padding" is replacing true research in classrooms. "In general, it overwhelms you with too much information, much of which is hopelessly unreliable or beside the point. It's like looking for a lost ring in a vacuum bag. What you end up with mostly are bagel crumbs and dirt."

It's probably safe to say that most people aren't using Google to stay abreast of the writings of Jacques Derrida. A link hidden on Google's jobs page charts nearly 600 different misspellings of "Britney Spears" detected by the spelling correction system. And no one needed the Google Zeitgeist page — at Google.com
/press/zeitgeist.html — to know that Janet Jackson was the top emergent query for much of February.

But Google's own role in the zeitgeist is still indeterminable. Theoretically, at least, all that rampant Googling must be an improvement over mindless channel flipping and utter ignorance. Surely, the curiosity that brings one to a Google search must serve some higher cultural purpose.

In matters of creativity, there is no question that Google can transport users to unexpected places. While shooting a Jay-Z video at the Marcy public housing project in Brooklyn last month, the director Mark Romanek wondered who Marcy was. A quick Google search on his wireless laptop unearthed William Learned Marcy, a 19th-century governor of New York, which inspired Mr. Romanek to insert a portrait of Marcy into the video. "I recently bought a larger computer screen," he said, "essentially so I can have Google open on one side and whatever script I'm writing on the other."

People on the dating scene are just as smitten. Old lovers are reuniting via Google, and new ones are checking each other out. "By the time someone asks you for dinner," said Rael Dornfest, an author of "Google Hacks," a 300-page manual for advanced Googling, "you can easily know a big chunk of that person's life story." In January, a New York City woman ran a suitor's name through the search engine only to learn that he was wanted for fraud by the F.B.I. A few clicks later, the man was apprehended at an Applebee's restaurant on Long Island.

"Google makes it harder than ever to escape the past," said Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford law professor and a leading thinker on the Internet and the law. "If you went to a state school before you enrolled at Harvard Business School or if your sexual orientation is something you kept private but someone discussed it on a blog, those facts are now in the permanent record."

And of course, everyone is fair game for those inquisitive types who track people down and insist on filling their e-mail "in" boxes with lengthy updates about what they have been doing since nursery school. In Britain, a former mathematics student named Dave Gorman has created a popular play, a book and a television series based on his "Googlewhack" adventure, in which he chased down 54 other Dave Gormans, all while trolling you know where. "We haven't developed effective norms yet for all the relationships that develop" because of Google, Mr. Lessig said. "The expectations are, if I find you and send a five-page e-mail, you must reply. That's an extraordinary burden."

The bigger burden may be on Google itself and on beefing up the content and organization of the information it presents. "The terrifying and wonderful observation about Google is that people these days are using it as an information resource of first resort," said Brewster Kahle, chairman of the Internet Archive, which is preserving hundreds of millions of Web pages for their historical value. "Unfortunately, many of them also believe if something's not on Google, it doesn't exist."

Google's new headquarters in a quiet corporate park in Mountain View, Calif., is what graduate school would be like if all the students were rich. The 500,000-square-foot center, known as the Googleplex, is an unflagging emblem of Silicon Valley's vaunted geek-chic aesthetic. A volleyball court is outside. Doodle surfaces are the size of billboards. Puppies waddle in and out of conference rooms. The Grateful Dead's former caterer dishes out free lunches and dinners of seitan veggie kebabs and Chateaubriand.

The company was founded in a Stanford University dorm in 1998 by two doctoral students, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and later moved to a Palo Alto garage. Its initial offering of public shares, feverishly anticipated by investors, is expected soon. "Search was underappreciated for so long, but people now recognize all Web searches aren't alike," Mr. Brin said. This month Forbes magazine added him and his partner, both in their early 30's, to the list of the world's richest people.

"Google's major limitations have to do with the devices you access it with today," Mr. Brin said. "The Web is an infinite improvement over the library, but in the future, people won't hold off on searching. Ideally, you'll access the world's information almost as easily as you access your own memory."

Google watchers are reserving judgment on that. Joseph Janes asked the students in his Google seminar to observe themselves searching. "I wanted to know if life is more satisfying in a Google universe," he said. "Most of them decided it's pretty helpful most of the time. Yes, you can find sites that tell you Texas was never a state or that the cure for Hodgkin's disease is to drink bat guano, but if you want to know the capital of Bolivia, go to Google and out it will come."

For its part, Google does not claim to be the last word on anything. "Does it change the world?" asked Craig Silverstein, Google's director of technology and its first employee. "Not necessarily. But we think Google makes conversations richer and more fruitful. With it, you improve the quality of discourse. Or at least have bar arguments that are more well-informed."

Susan Wojcicki, whose garage sheltered Google in its early days and who is now director of product placement, says the simple pleasures are what keep Googlers Googling. "I was able to figure out what my ex-boyfriend's wife looks like," she said. "That was really satisfying."
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/24/2004 6:48 PM
Quote
quote:

And, like every self-respecting Hollywood player, he Googles himself. Competitively.

"Guys all over town are on the phone saying, `I bet I can get more Google hits than you.' " he said recently. "It's become this ridiculous new power game."
Searched the web for "BEN SILVERMAN". Results 1 - 10 of about 4,860. Search took 0.53 seconds.

Searched the web for "AllenAyres". Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600. Search took 0.47 seconds.
Searched the web for "Allen Ayres". Results 1 - 10 of about 3,680. Search took 0.15 seconds

tipsy
Posted By: Charles Capps Re: Google, Barney - 03/24/2004 9:14 PM
Allen == celeb!
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 03/24/2004 9:15 PM
Searched the web for Ian Spence. Results 1 - 10 of about 88,900. Search took 0.27 seconds

w00t
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:20 AM
Searched the web for "Ian Spence". Results 1 - 10 of about 3,790. Search took 0.20 seconds

tipsy
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:28 AM
3790 > 3680

Double w00t!
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:32 AM
Searched the web for "IanSpence". Results 1 - 10 of about 28. Search took 0.15
Searched the web for "Ian Spence". Results 1 - 10 of about 3,790. Search took 0.20 seconds

28 + 3,790 = 3,818

=============================================

Searched the web for "AllenAyres". Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600. Search took 0.47 seconds.
Searched the web for "Allen Ayres". Results 1 - 10 of about 3,680. Search took 0.15 seconds


29,600 + 3,680 = 33,280

33,280 > 3,818

tipsy
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:33 AM
heheh wink
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:40 AM
Gizmo = Results 1 - 10 of about 612,000
Gizzy = Results 1 - 10 of about 9,180

Got you all beat! But then again their all loosers who use the name cas of Gremelins (I'll admit that I love the movie, but I've used the nick prior!)...
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 2:43 AM
Allen, that's just cheap frown I've never used IanSpence anywhere, where as you use it everywhere (AllenAyres that is).

Searched the web for "Weird Al". Results 1 - 10 of about 397,000. Search took 0.13 seconds.

Don't make me change my name back wink tipsy
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 3:07 AM
James Corthell -> Results 1 - 10 of about 1,880
Posted By: tackaberry Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 6:32 PM
Searched the web for tackaberry. Results 1 - 10 of about 12,000. Search took 0.34 seconds

Searched the web for tacks. Results 1 - 10 of about 354,000. Search took 0.22 seconds.
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 6:48 PM
Searched the web for Allen. Results 1 - 10 of about 28,900,000. Search took 0.22 seconds

rockband
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 03/25/2004 6:51 PM
wink

laugh
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 03/26/2004 12:46 AM
cheater!
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/06/2004 7:00 PM
:sniffle: in a GoogleFight between "James Corthell" and "Allen Ayres", allen win's by a landslide...
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 08/06/2004 7:35 PM
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300
Posted By: Charles Capps Re: Google, Barney - 08/06/2004 8:02 PM
Mua. I are teh winnar!!11
Posted By: navaho Re: Google, Barney - 08/06/2004 8:40 PM
Did I ever mention that if you google my name you find instances of PinkJazz using my name as his username on a Power Rangers board?
Posted By: LK Re: Google, Barney - 08/06/2004 8:44 PM
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=LK&q2=Charles+Capps&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

I'm still the champion! laugh
Posted By: navaho Re: Google, Barney - 08/07/2004 4:04 AM
But at least some of the listings under Charles Capps are actually our Charles Capps.

At least all of the listings under my name are actually me.


Well, if they aren't PinkJazz, that is.
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/07/2004 8:27 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:

http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300
Now it's 700 tipsy
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 08/07/2004 9:05 PM
Well that explains the 300 guests a couple days ago. You'd be screwed if AFA was indexed.
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/08/2004 6:05 AM
you want spidered you say wink ...
Posted By: Ian Spence Re: Google, Barney - 08/08/2004 6:28 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gizzy:

you want spidered you say wink ...

it is spidered. It isn't indexed. I think google hates me, as MSN and Yahoo have me indexed
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/08/2004 7:25 AM
Odd, they love me wink ... They also love the sites in my spider.php page lol...
Posted By: MsGuidedAngel Re: Google, Barney - 08/11/2004 12:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gizzy:

cheater!

LOL guys!! laugh


Google and Froogle now! sheez what is next! LOL
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/11/2004 12:16 AM
they also have gmail and orkut wink
Posted By: MsGuidedAngel Re: Google, Barney - 08/12/2004 2:24 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Gizzy:

they also have gmail and orkut wink

uh huh, and I don't use it!! I have enough Emails for now, LOL... laugh
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/13/2004 6:07 AM
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:

Searched the web for "AllenAyres". Results 1 - 10 of about 29,600. Search took 0.47 seconds.

Searched the web for "Allen Ayres". Results 1 - 10 of about 3,680. Search took 0.15 seconds
Searched the web for "AllenAyres". Results 1 - 10 of about 74,500 for AllenAyres. (1.67 seconds)

Searched the web for "Allen Ayres". Results 1 - 10 of about 109,000 for Allen Ayres. (0.23 seconds)

eek

ps, I'm still ahead of BEN SILVERMAN tipsy
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/13/2004 6:10 AM
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:
http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300

Now it's 700 tipsy

Now it's >4,000 laugh
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/13/2004 6:56 AM
12,000 now lol
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 01/07/2006 8:52 AM
hmm.. Ian has pulled ahead by nearly 200k smash
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 01/07/2006 3:57 PM
Psh, Gizmo vs Allen Ayres owns you lol
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2006 7:23 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:

http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300

Now it's 700 tipsy

Now it's >4,000 laugh


Now it's 60,000 tipsy
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2006 9:43 PM
It's not our fault that you spam wink ...
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 06/26/2006 10:56 AM
tipsy

How do I find all sites that contain a particular phrase (like: "Bill Gates") but NOT all pages within the site. I don't want the 50million pages in one site who writes "Bill Gates" in the title, just that it show up one time (be counted as one).

Say, I want to see how many sites run ubb.classic, how would I google (or yahoo, or msn) to see how many sites have at least one page that says: UBB.classic™
??
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 06/27/2006 2:06 AM
I don't know of a way to limit results to one keyword per site with google...
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 07/02/2006 5:39 PM
they need a 'unique' modifier smile
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/15/2006 11:31 PM
I think I may have found it smile

It appears you can specify that a particular piece of the url be present in all search results, so that if I want to know how many vbulletin 3.5.x there are out there and not just the bajillion posts that are indexed at google, I subtract the 'powered by vbulletin' include the vbulletin 3.5* and specify inurl:index.php:

"- powered by vbulletin" "vBulletin Version 3.5" inurl:"index.php"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22-+powered+by+vbulletin%22++%22vBulletin+Version+3.5%22+inurl%3A%22index.php%22&btnG=Search

gives me ~476k. This can be adapted to most any script I am sure, as long as there's a specific url piece you want (like a faq page faq.php, etc.) As long as google can get to it, then it will be indexed.

I am sure this is only an estimate, but is closer than just typing in ubb.threads and getting 20trillion links smile
Posted By: Harold Re: Google, Barney - 08/20/2006 11:35 PM
Results 1 - 10 of about 6,310,000 for harold andrews. My clones and I win. smile
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/24/2006 7:18 AM
tipsy

Here's something I think is interesting: Seems there's still more than 23,000 pre-6 series ubb's out there:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22ultimate+bulletin+board%22+inurl%3A%22Ultimate.cgi%22&btnG=Search
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/25/2006 12:42 PM
Bet you 80% of them don't own licenses wink
Posted By: Burak Re: Google, Barney - 08/26/2006 9:29 AM
It looks like Freeware 2000d & UGB are still alive too tipsy
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/26/2006 5:37 PM
That guestbook has a life of it's own smile

Wasn't freeware 2000d a warez version? I was thinking it stopped at 2000c.


Sidenote: Here's an eejit still running the "Earthquake Edition"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22earthquake%22+inurl%3A%22ultimatebb.cgi%3Fubb%3Dfaq%22&btnG=Search

laugh
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 08/26/2006 5:46 PM
A few morsel's from said eejit's site http://www.starbase45.com/history.htm

Quote

In 1998 I was going to Benjamin Franklin Middle School. I had always been interested in computers so I took the "Advanced Technology" class there. The teacher and I became good friends. Among many other things the teacher did for me, she took me to a class on HTML and Adobe Pagemill, and she paid. So boom, I knew yet another thing about computers.

laugh

Quote

Many of my friends treat me like a god so many people came to my site to worship me. Others just came to see what the latest shiznit was. All good, I was happy. As of March 2001, I was still generating 10 hits per month.

laugh

He gets my vote for eejit of web1.0 wink
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 08/27/2006 12:59 AM
rofl "I AM GOD! HEAR ME ROAR!" lol
Posted By: Philipp Re: Google, Barney - 08/27/2006 10:57 AM
Originally Posted by AllenAyres
Wasn't freeware 2000d a warez version? I was thinking it stopped at 2000c.
No, 2000d was actually the last freeware version:
http://community.groupee.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/479091422/m/5443002313

There are a lot older UBB freeware installations out there:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22Ultimate+Bulletin+Board%2C+Freeware+Version+A%22&btnG=Search smile
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 09/08/2007 8:38 PM
Originally Posted by AllenAyres
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:

http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300

Now it's 700 tipsy


Now it's 290,000 tipsy

Ian Spence vs. Allen Ayres
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/09/2007 2:17 AM
I like their new intro for the fight sequence hehe
Posted By: jgeoff Re: Google, Barney - 09/09/2007 8:31 AM

Gizmo totally kicks my @$$! eek Obviously they're not all for him, tho :lol:

(OMG, still no LOL shortcode? tipsy wink )

And who drew this " tipsy " ? [Linked Image]

The Classic smilies rule them all [Linked Image]

Here:
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[img]http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/images/graemlins/default/uhwhat.gif[/img] (not classic, but awesome)
[img]http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/images/graemlins/default/smile.gif[/img]
[img]http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/images/graemlins/default/confused.gif[/img]
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/09/2007 9:51 AM
I kick double a's butt... clicky

Posted By: jgeoff Re: Google, Barney - 09/10/2007 6:11 AM

But "gizmo" is in the dictionary - no fair!!!! tipsy [Linked Image] wink
Posted By: jgeoff Re: Google, Barney - 09/11/2007 11:18 AM
The difference is much less when AA and I go at it... tho he still wins - for now! tipsy wink

And yes, Gizmo is still disqualified as a dictionary word tipsy wink
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/11/2007 12:32 PM
:sad ninja:
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 09/11/2007 10:44 PM
Originally Posted by Gizmo
I kick double a's butt... clicky



Interesting - AllenAyres is 36k while Allen Ayres is 1.65million eek
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 09/11/2007 10:46 PM
Originally Posted by Gizmo
I kick double a's butt... clicky



Actually, if you use only my first name, much like yours, I totally womp you:

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Allen&word2=gizmo

Nearly 300million thumbsup
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 09/11/2007 10:47 PM
Originally Posted by jgeoff


Yes, they do. My users prefer them to most of the new ones smile
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/12/2007 10:00 AM
But no fair, you go by AA, I go by Gizmo; so there isn't anything to build on :x
Posted By: navaho Re: Google, Barney - 09/12/2007 10:00 PM
flex and flex some more
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 09/12/2007 10:28 PM
It's a little more of a fair fight if you use:

Allen Ayres

instead of:

AllenAyres

tipsy

That'd be like doing this.

tipsy
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/13/2007 7:11 AM
Psh but dave, I don't go by Gizzy, so why search for it?

Posted By: navaho Re: Google, Barney - 09/18/2007 1:13 AM
Who said anything about a fair fight? Of course I skewed the searches to make me win. tipsy
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 09/18/2007 3:47 AM
You, skewer?
Posted By: sirdude Re: Google, Barney - 09/19/2007 10:21 PM
Yarp™
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 12/20/2007 12:05 AM
I found my alternate universe person:

www.allanayres.com

He's a photographer, but uses nikon - must be from the dark side eek
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 12/20/2007 12:11 AM
ha, here I am again:

http://www.alanayres.com/

Now I'm a tv producer in the UK. confused
Posted By: Gizmo Re: Google, Barney - 12/20/2007 2:42 AM
Allan vs Alan vs Allen... The war continues!
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2008 12:22 AM
Originally Posted by AllenAyres
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:

http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300

Now it's 700 tipsy

Now it's >4,000 laugh


Now it's 60,000 tipsy


Now it's >1.6million eek

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ian+Spence&word2=Allen+Ayres
Posted By: sirdude Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2008 12:33 AM
Originally Posted by AllenAyres
Originally Posted by AllenAyres
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by AllenAyres:
Quote
Originally posted by Ian Spence:

http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Ian+Spence&q2=Allen+Ayres&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us

lost by 300

Now it's 700 tipsy

Now it's >4,000 laugh


Now it's 60,000 tipsy


Now it's >1.6million eek

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ian+Spence&word2=Allen+Ayres

test

hrm.. why does nesting quotes work here (nesting > 4) and not on ubbcentral?

:shrug:
Posted By: AllenAyres Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2008 2:08 AM
Not sure, this was an old post I actually had to go in and correct the html on, once I did that it just works.
Posted By: sirdude Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2008 6:36 AM
Originally Posted by 1

inner level 1
Originally Posted by 2

inner level 2
Originally Posted by 3

inner level 3
Originally Posted by 4

inner level 4
Originally Posted by 5

inner level 5

interesting that a new post pukes immediately :shrug:

Posted By: sirdude Re: Google, Barney - 06/01/2008 6:47 AM
Originally Posted by outer5
Quote
Originally Posted by outer3
Originally Posted by outer2
Quote

deepest level
level +1
level +2
level +3
level +4

interesting that a new post pukes immediately :shrug:


ok, figured it out -- you can do it, if you don't use the same quote syntax each time..

ie: quote, quote=, quote: can never be 4 in a row.. it blows up then.. the regex and handle_quote code in bbcode.inc.php needs to be smarter.. /me pokes Ian Spence with a bug wink

© UBB.Developers