Persistant = Bad! - 10/14/2003 3:17 PM
Let me just say my experience with persistant connections did not work out. I have two Threads systems on my dual xeon processor dell server with 2gb of ram. I fugred persistant would be good. I was very wrong.
SHOW STATUS showed hundreds of connections, many waiting on a timeout. 100% memory usage and about 1.5gb of swap usage. My server went from 2,000 queries/min to its current level of around 6,000 queries/min and persistant connections was a real bad idea.
Just in case anyone else was considering it - it would seem that high traffic sites should avoid this.
SHOW STATUS showed hundreds of connections, many waiting on a timeout. 100% memory usage and about 1.5gb of swap usage. My server went from 2,000 queries/min to its current level of around 6,000 queries/min and persistant connections was a real bad idea.
Just in case anyone else was considering it - it would seem that high traffic sites should avoid this.