|
|
#91923
07/05/2001 2:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 615
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 615 |
CPU load I guess. Ask CC about that 
|
|
|
#91924
07/05/2001 10:21 PM
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7 |
I used venturesonline, and emailed john burns about it. Here's what he said.
|
|
|
#91925
07/06/2001 3:57 AM
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,708
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,708 |
I'd say It's CPU Cycles that are bogging the server down. They do it all the time.
|
|
|
#91926
07/06/2001 12:16 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3
I type Like navaho
|
|
I type Like navaho
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,079 Likes: 3 |
That and maybe because we banned him from here because he was being an eejit...:)
6.1 reduces the main performance bottle-neck in the 6.0x series by a huge amount.
|
|
|
#91927
07/06/2001 12:47 PM
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,042 Likes: 7 |
|
|
|
#91928
07/06/2001 1:43 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 168
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 168 |
No, they had some major problems with perl scripts the server's load was going up too 200, so they decided it best to kill that off.. And I'm sure the ban helped too 
|
|
|
#91929
07/06/2001 2:05 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1 |
Ah, the joys of hosts who can't administrate their own servers. *sigh*
They're not the first, and probably won't be the last. Packing a thousand people on one machine and expecting it to perform well is just plain wrong. Quality hosts simply won't let a situation like that develop in the first place!
And they expect MySQL to be a cureall... HAH! Watch their poor servers melt down again....
|
|
|
#91930
07/06/2001 3:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,625
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,625 |
6.1.0 will fix most I/O problems
|
|
|
#91931
07/06/2001 6:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 62
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 62 |
From what I have seen from this issue it looks to be the Win32 & IIS based servers that have the most problems. I haven't come across a UBB 6 running on a *nix box which has hogged all the CPU load. I spoke to a couple of ISP's here in the UK earlier about this, and they said that they haven't had any of the CPU load problems with users running high usage UBB v6's.
|
|
|
#91932
07/06/2001 8:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073
Admin Emeritus
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,073 |
It's all in the I/O. We ARE aware that UBB has some pretty serious issues, and are taking steps to reduce I/O in future releases. If you have ANY questions or concerns about this, please email celeste@infopop.com rather than post here. Thanks!
UBB.classic: Love it or hate it, it was mine.
|
|
|
Donate to UBBDev today to help aid in Operational, Server and Script Maintenance, and Development costs.
Please also see our parent organization VNC Web Services if you're in the need of a new UBB.threads Install or Upgrade, Site/Server Migrations, or Security and Coding Services.
|
|
|
Posts: 417
Joined: November 2001
|
|
|
Forums63
Topics37,573
Posts293,925
Members13,849
| |
Most Online5,166
Sep 15th, 2019
|
|
Currently Online
Topics Created
Posts Made
Users Online
Birthdays
|
|
|
|
|
|
